NOTE · SE-06 · SERVICES
Six disciplines on the coral footnote rail
Every engagement ships with artifacts your faculty and data team can act on — annotated schemas, learner modelling profiles, outcomes insight reports and responsible-AI documentation. Analytics reviews from C$14,000; full production engagements typically C$40,000–C$110,000 depending on integration depth and cohort complexity.
Learning Analytics & Outcomes Insight
We translate LMS clickstreams, assessment logs and programme outcomes into cohort performance trends faculty can read in under twenty minutes. Each metric ships with a plain-language construct definition, known data-quality flags and the instructional decision it supports — not vanity charts that conflate login counts with mastery. Discovery audits map your current dashboards against stated learning objectives; delivery includes an outcomes insight report with educator sign-off gates before anything reaches a dean's inbox. Typical timeline: four to eight weeks from first data cut to published view.
From C$14,000 (analytics review) · C$45,000–C$85,000 (full view build)
Adaptive & Personalised Learning Models
Personalised learning path recommendations built on documented limits — prediction confidence ranges, not false certainty. We model prerequisite skill gaps, recommend next activities with rationale strings instructors can override, and instrument A/B cohorts so adaptation effects are measurable rather than assumed. Models are fit to your content graph and assessment taxonomy; we do not drop a generic recommender on your LMS and call it adaptive. Every path suggestion includes an uncertainty footnote and a human-in-the-loop review checkpoint before learners see automated routing.
C$55,000–C$95,000 · pilot + production handoff
Knowledge Tracing & Learner Modelling
Skill mastery estimates derived from attempt sequences, spacing intervals and item difficulty parameters — grounded in learning-science literature, not black-box scores. Learner modelling profiles aggregate per-skill posterior probabilities with confidence intervals; counsellors and instructors see who is struggling before the midterm says it out loud. Knowledge tracing informs tutoring adjustments and resource allocation; it does not auto-expel anyone or issue credentials. We document model assumptions, calibration drift checks and retraining triggers so your team owns the methodology after we leave.
C$48,000–C$88,000 · includes calibration workshop
Automated Feedback & Assessment Support
Automated feedback drafts for educator review — never auto-issued to learners without human sign-off. We build rubric-aligned comment generators, misconception classifiers and confidence-calibration prompts that reduce instructor grading load while preserving academic integrity. Every automated suggestion logs its source evidence and model version; instructors can edit, reject or escalate before students see feedback. Assessment support includes item analysis, distractor review and integrity flags for suspicious response patterns — always framed as decision support, not adjudication.
C$38,000–C$72,000 · per programme or module cluster
Accessibility & Inclusive-Learning AI
Inclusive-learning features and accessibility audit passes built into analytics pipelines before dashboards reach stakeholders. We evaluate screen-reader compatibility of data visualisations, colour-contrast thresholds for at-risk indicators, caption and transcript coverage for embedded media analytics, and multilingual label support for diverse cohorts. Bias review runs across demographic subgroups where sample sizes permit; where they do not, we document the limitation rather than hiding it. Accessibility is a design constraint from discovery — not a compliance checkbox at launch.
C$22,000–C$48,000 · standalone audit or bundled
Reporting Integration & Responsible-AI Assurance
Production reporting wired into workflows instructors already use — SIS exports, dean's dashboards, accreditation binders and research ethics documentation. Responsible-AI assurance covers model QA, bias review, student-privacy safeguard documentation and BC FIPPA / PIPEDA alignment for public-sector clients. We deliver integration specs, sample queries, QA checklists and a model card for every deployed algorithm. Retention analysis reads and cohort trend reports track against agreed measurable outcomes with quarterly review cadences built into the handoff plan.
C$40,000–C$110,000 · full engagement range
DATA SESSION · SE-11
How engagements start
Most clients begin with an analytics review: we ingest your current dashboards, event logs and stated outcomes, then produce a gap analysis mapped to decision-ready metrics. Senior learning scientists stay on the file from scoping through delivery — no bait-and-switch to junior staff after the proposal is signed.
We serve K-12 districts, BC colleges, Canadian universities and edtech vendors preparing for institutional procurement. Remote delivery is standard; on-site workshops available along the Broadway corridor and Canada Line catchment.
Request an analytics review
Not sure which discipline fits?
Describe your cohort question on the contact form. We will recommend an entry point — usually an analytics review — within two business days.
Request an analytics review